Der internationale PEN fordert weiterhin, dass die Anklagepunkte gegen die prominente feministische Akademikerin und Aktivistin Dr. Stella Nyanzi fallen gelassen werden. Dr. Stella Nyanzi muss daher bei ihrer nächsten Gerichtsanhörung am 21. August 2017 endlich freigesprochen wird. Sie war am 7. April 2017 verhaftet worden, drei Tage später wurde ihr Cyber-Belästigung und anstößige Kommunikation vorgeworfen, da sie in ihren Facebook-Beiträgen Ugandas Präsidenten Yoweri Museveni kritisierte und dabei beleidigt haben soll. Am 10. Mai wurde sie dann nach 33 Tagen Haft auf Kaution freigelassen.
Der internationale PEN geht davon aus, dass Dr. Nyanzi lediglich wegen ihrer friedlichen Meinungsäußerung inhaftiert wurde und fordert die ugandischen Behörden daher auf, die Freiheit der Meinungsäußerung zu wahren und es Dr. Nyanzi zu ermöglichen, ihren Aktivismus ungehindert fortzusetzen. Die Anklage gegen sie muss fallengelassen werden.
Unternehmen Sie etwas: Teilen Sie den Artikel auf facebook, Twitter und anderen sozialen Netzwerken.
Bitte senden Sie Protestbriefe:
– Fordern Sie die ugandischen Behörden auf, die Anklage gegen Dr. Nyanzi sofort und bedingungslos aufzuheben
– Fordern Sie die ugandischen Behörden auf, ihre Verpflichtung gegenüber dem Recht auf freie Meinungsäußerung einzuhalten, wie es in der ugandischen Verfassung und im Internationalen Pakt über bürgerliche und politische Rechte, den Uganda unterzeichnet hat, versichert wird
Schreiben Sie an:
Mr. Mike Chibita
Director of Public Prosecutions
Directorate of Public Prosecutions
Workers House, Plot 1 Pilkington Road
mike.chibita [at] dpp.go [dot] ug
Major General (rtd) Kahinda Otafiire
Minister of Justice and Constitutional Affairs
Bauman House, Plot 5, Parliament Avenue
P. O. Box 7183
Email: info [at] justice.go [dot] ug
Hintergrund (bereitgestellt vom internationalen PEN in englischer Sprache):
Dr. Nyanzi, who often uses provocative language and metaphor in her writings and her social media posts, was arrested on 7 April 2017 and charged with cyber harassment and offensive communication under the Computer Misuse Act of 2011 on 10 April. The charges are based on Facebook posts, in particular one from January 2017 in which she called President Yoweri Museveni a ‘pair of buttocks’.
At the hearing on 10 April, Dr. Nyanzi was denied bail and the prosecution called for an investigation into her mental health. When Dr. Nyanzi appeared in court again on 25 April, her bail application was postponed until 10 May, when, after 33 days in prison, her bail application was finally heard and approved. Reports indicated Dr. Nyanzi was unwell at the hearing on 10 May. Nyanzi later posted on her Facebook page that she had become unwell in prison but was on medication to treat her illnesses.
In May, Dr. Nyanzi filed a petition before the Constitutional Court challenging the colonial-era Mental Treatment Act. On 20 June 2017, the Chief Magistrate at Buganda Road Magistrates Court stayed proceedings intended to inquire into the mental state of Dr. Nyanzi, pending her petition to the Constitutional Court. The court also denied the state’s request to cancel her bail, as Dr. Nyanzi’s Facebook posts criticising the State Attorney did not violate the sub-judice rule (a rule that governs what public statements can be made about ongoing legal proceedings) or amount to contempt of court.
After the 20 June ruling, Dr. Nyanzi stated on her public Facebook page that although the criminal case and the constitutional petition had not yet been heard and “although it is still early days, these two wins have restored my faith in Uganda’s justice systems.” In response to the Chief Magistrate asking her to „tone down on [her] language“, Dr. Nyanzi stated: „[B]ecause this Chief Magi. got the essence of my Facebook post and granted me double-justice, I am indeed going to soften my language when discussing matters concerning the case before him. While I do not negotiate with dictators, I can break my hard will and reign in my dangerously hot grenades of words when faced with a just magi.“
According to reports, a court hearing on 21 July was adjourned until 21 August, to allow the State Attorney time to consult the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) on how to proceed with the trial.
In the months leading up to her arrest, Dr. Nyanzi had been outspoken in her criticism of President Museveni and his wife Janet, who is also the Minister of Education. In particular, she had criticised the government’s failure to fulfil President Museveni’s 2016 election campaign promise to provide sanitary pads to all schoolgirls. Dr. Nyanzi subsequently started a campaign to raise money to buy and distribute sanitary pads for the schoolgirls. She was questioned by police in early March and was prevented from boarding a plane to the Netherlands to attend an academic conference on 19 March. She was arrested on 7 April in Kampala after attending a talk at the Rotary Club about the campaign.
According to the Guardian, referencing a Facebook post of an activist who attended the hearing on 10 April, Dr. Nyanzi is alleged to have responded to the charges by saying: „Offensive communication? Who is offended? How long are Ugandans going to be silent because of fear […] I am an academic, poet. A writer. I use my writing metaphorically. I have called the president impotent, a rapist, a pathetic pair of buttocks. He lied to voters that he would provide pads and Ugandans are offended that he is such a dishonourable man. It is we who are offended, not him.“
The African Studies Association has pointed to the long history of the use of provocative speech in Uganda’s public life and referred to Dr. Nyanzi’s posts on Facebook and other media as standing in this same tradition.
The right of free speech is enshrined in Uganda’s Constitution and, as a state party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), Uganda has the obligation to protect freedom of expression. Freedom of expression includes the right to offend, particularly within the context of thoughts and opinions relating to public officials. The United Nations Human Rights Committee, which oversees the implementation of the ICCPR, has made clear that the ‘mere fact that forms of expression are considered to be insulting to a public figure is not sufficient to justify the imposition of penalties.’ Human rights bodies have also pointed out that heads of state and public figures should tolerate a higher degree of criticism than ordinary citizens.